Thermal Print Head Life & Cost
Direct thermal printing requires the print head elements be in direct contact with the label material as it is pulled across the print head. Conversely, thermal transfer printing has thermal ribbon acting as a “buffer” between the print head elements and the label material. Many thermal ribbons are designed with a back-coating that serves to increase print head life by reducing static and friction. This benefit is not possible when direct thermal printing due to the lack of ribbon. Instead, the label material is in direct and constant contact with the print head, resulting in increased wear when compared to thermal transfer printing.
In direct thermal applications, dust and debris that may become present on labels are in direct contact with the print head. As these foreign materials are pulled across the print head, they may burn onto the elements or physically damage the elements resulting in poor print quality and/or premature print head failure. The same foreign material can exist in thermal transfer printing applications, but the debris would be between the label and the ribbon (i.e. not in contact with the print head elements) reducing the potential for damage.
Print head life in direct thermal printing applications is significantly reduced when compared to thermal transfer printing applications. Generally speaking, a company should anticipate direct thermal print heads providing an expected lifetime of 25% - 50% of a thermal transfer print head. As an example, if a company is printing 10 million, six inch long labels per period with an expected thermal transfer print head life of 4 million inches, they would expect to replace the print head 15 times. If the same application were direct thermal, they would expect to replace the print head 30 – 60 times. Depending upon throughput volumes, the cost differential may be significant and has to be considered in any evaluation.
Printer Configuration & Cost
Printer configuration is one area where some cost savings will be available. Thermal transfer printers normally have the capability of printing either thermal transfer or direct thermal. If an organization is only going to print direct thermal, there are printers available that only have direct thermal capability. These printers are generally less costly to purchase because they do not contain any of the hardware necessary for driving and controlling ribbon. Eliminating the ribbon and ribbon hardware components also results in a less complex printer with fewer parts to wear and/or break, resulting in lower service costs and less downtime over the life of the printer. Additionally, operators don’t have to be concerned with ribbon settings or adjustments, leading to improved uptime and increased efficiency. The process of changing thermal ribbon requires downtime. Even the best operator still needs several minutes to replace used ribbon with a new roll and downtime costs money. A standard size, 450 meter roll of ribbon will provide about 2,800 six-inch labels. If running 20 products per minute, for example, calculate into the evaluation several minutes of downtime about every 2.5 hours. Doesn’t seem like much? If calculated at 20 hours per day average production, the result over one year would be 144 hours of downtime for ribbon changes.
Some printer models feature large label and ribbon roll capacity's reducing time required between media changes and making operations more efficient. SATO's CLNX thermal printers with a newly designed ribbon and label system supports the use of large rolls of ribbon with lengths up to 600m and label rolls with an outer diameter of up to10" - thereby extending the printers operation and lowering the media loading time by as much as 43%.
Media Selection & Cost
Media choice directly impacts the cost of labels, it will also impact the life of the print head, upper-end print speed capabilities and print quality. These are important considerations as they may impact the ongoing cost of operations. Print head and label are in direct contact with one another during the direct thermal printing process. Therefore, the media acts as a direct abrasive as it is pulled across the print head. If the labels are too abrasive, they will prematurely wear out the print head resulting in increased replacement costs. Many believe the use of a “coated” direct thermal label is a better solution than an “un-coated” label. It may be, but don’t depend simply on the description that a direct thermal label is “coated” to mean it’s a good label. Inferior labels can be coated the same as any other label. Therefore, a “coated” label doesn’t necessarily mean it will outperform a non-coated label. There’s no getting away from the label abrading the print head, but choice of media can make a huge difference in the frequency of print head replacement.
Different labels will image at different temperatures resulting in varying quality of print at different printer speed and heat settings. Choose media that can image at the printer speeds necessary to meet the production line’s throughput requirements while minimizing the printer’s heat setting. At the same time, print quality must be considered. Poor print quality can lead to un-scannable barcodes resulting in supply chain inefficiency and retailer charge-backs. Reputable label converters should have considerable experience with a variety of direct thermal label materials and should be able to provide several good suggestions as a starting point for media testing. When comparing the direct costs associated with media selection, one has to compare the cost of thermal transfer labels plus thermal transfer ribbon with the cost of direct thermal media. Eliminating the use of ribbon obviously eliminates the cost associated with the ribbon. However, the higher cost of direct thermal labels over thermal transfer labels generally wipes out that savings and then some. Media costs are all over the board depending upon the actual media selected, the label size and the volumes purchased. As a general rule, direct thermal labels will cost more than thermal transfer labels plus ribbon. However, the cost differential can be as low as 5% or as high as 50% depending upon the factors cited above.
Label Life Requirements
Requirements surrounding label life get back to the heart of the difference between direct thermal labels and thermal transfer labels…direct thermal printed labels simply do not offer the same lifetime as a thermal transfer printed label. An organization must know its label life requirements before considering direct thermal labels.
If the product being labeled could be in the supply chain for an extended period of time or in extreme conditions such as direct sunlight or chemical contact, then the technology used should likely be thermal transfer. For example, building materials are often transported unprotected and stored outdoors. Not a good choice for direct thermal technology. Another consideration would be if the information on the label is extremely critical and must be readable for an indeterminate amount of time. Examples might include pharmaceutical products or hazardous materials. These items should likely utilize thermal transfer printed labels to ensure a long lifetime.
Conversely, if the product has a short life in the supply chain and is not exposed to harsh environmental conditions, then direct thermal may very well be a good choice. Examples of this type product could include fresh meat, dairy products and shipped parcels. Regulatory requirements for privacy of information are another area impacting the use of direct thermal media. In healthcare, patient privacy can be at risk if personal information is available on used thermal transfer ribbon. This has led to an increased use of direct thermal media for prescription labels and patient wristbands, for example.
In today’s world waste reduction, lower carbon footprints and sustainability are increasingly part of corporate mission statements and, in some cases, used to increase competitive advantage. Thermal ribbon uses a poly-based carrier made, in part, from crude oil products. Eliminating the use of thermal transfer ribbon can therefore positively impact a company’s goal for a reduced carbon footprint. Direct thermal technology eliminates the use of thermal ribbons and therefore eliminates the waste created through its use, but it is not suitable for all application. As advances in direct thermal materials continue to expand the potential use applications, the above considerations will take on increased importance in organizations where the choice of technology exists.
The Linerless Kit Option is designed to print self-adhesive labels without backing papers. The elimination of backing paper means less consumption and less waste making it a great solution for environmentally conscience organization.
Evaluating these criteria and their associated costs is the only way to determine the best course of action. Each organization and potentially each use application within an organization will be different and will require evaluation based on the application’s unique needs.